Social media sites like Digg started as a good idea. Kevin Rose was able to see the best news of mainstream media, has built Digg. The idea was that users could see that, and then vote with news, blogs, or article was the front page of Digg.
Here's how the social media sites launched. Then they began to grow and attract attention. communications increasingly came to the attention of Internet marketing has begun, and now manyMarketers say social media is a way for websites to market. present on the basis of this advice, bloggers contributions even more. Social media sites are bombarded with opinions. So many that it is hard to keep up. It is not spam, is the volume.
In principle one could read all communications, and vote for the top story was a fairly democratic process. The current volume makes it impossible to see for each user to all requests. This has led to a collapse of democracyVoting system.
Rather than examining the volume of memoirs, users may solidify social networks. These are the cracks in the social media sites where users have developed virtual relationships. The top-users on social media sites to filter the original volume by means of virtual relationships. Read and vote for the entries in the clique. The poster above makes it easy by the fact that the virtual quid pro quo relationship. The members of the cliqueVote, the contributions from the clique that they know their contributions are similar to fruit harvest.
This is a strategy well-known social media sites. You are encouraged to build relationships, and then the crack of your twitter, if you want to choose for your new job.
The members of this social media marketing professional rather cracks. These are people whose job it is to spend a day on Digg StumbleUpon, Digg o. Live bloggers thrive on social media sites, because theirJob Blog conference immediately. How does the average user with a day job to keep up with the pros?
This is what causes some applications to reach the pages of top social media sites. It is no longer the best content. More often than not achieved mediocre or poor content of the tip. Meanwhile, some of the best content on the Shuffle is lost as it's used for the first social media sites.
Already there are problems with social media sites. Marketing peoplewas thrown on this site is for cash. A particularly paid people to vote for certain applications, while the author's expense. The social media sites have responded by filling the user in question and terminated their membership. But the real question is whether social networks are less harmful? Instead of accepting money for votes, is the view of the nature of trading services for services clique. The votes are the currency of choice, and I will vote for you ifVote for me. E 'hypocritical to support the trade marks, but then votes to finish in cash?
If the crack has to defend its status as a top-poster? If every post suddenly 50 Diggs, Sphinn or stumble, it would not be the first item in the lost volume? If the top posters will probably reject any new authors a success? I have read posts where the posters above are responsible for reporting spam. They have no more judges to be spam, consciously orunconsciously to protect their territory. If yes, what stands the possibility of new and unique content.
And 'this is the fault of social media sites? No, it is more the result of being released to the masses. If the social relations through social media sites are resolved? I do not think so because it is a means to filter the volume of requests. What can you do? I do not know, but I believe that social media is at its peak. The next method to detect the quality of content, no matter whoAuthor, will be replaced at the end.
Free Coupon Hosting Domain All About SEO
0 ความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น