1. No matter how often you blog, Digg is not a fair democracy. the larger sites have more visitors and post Digg "icon" for a review of the traffic is already received more votes in a significant way compared to a site with less. His story also carries more weight and people are more inclined to vote for the same to you as sheep. It is a popular competition.
2. The people left right and center for a few pedantic egDotmySpot prohibited grounds.
3. You will find no benefit fromFile a separate article.
4. The traffic is good, but it often crashes the Digg site traffic or bandwidth to send the bill through the roof (not as a blog on Blogger are free). I do not have solutions, only problems.
5. You can not prevent an article you provided by someone else. This usually is not the same, but if you wrote an article a year ago, which is now obsolete, and someone has just brought out, you want to try a figFool.
6. There are probably better places for the same work - I will not cite examples because I do not want to start a war between them ...
Digg seventh traffic rarely click on ads, so it is not the same advertising dollars.
8. Many of the posts are completely off topic of Digg. This would not be so bad, but some do well on the front page!
9. It is not possible without recording an article Digg
10 "Digg may remove any Content and DiggAccount at any time (including, without limitation, the receipt of complaints or allegations from third parties or authorities relating to such content), for any reason or no reason. "It is not founded? What is all about!
0 ความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น