A man named John Markoff wrote a piece for The New York Times that in 2006, rather than a heated debate, one that is even more moves. He suggested that already in the scheme of things, but certainly not the first time will be the term "Web 3.0" is used to the Internet for the next phase of development, which would be predicted by a profusion of "intelligent applications to be classified as to describe. " Not like a clay-10-years on a ride, but: "We are almost there?"
No, thereBut it suspended the scheme in number - if you did, is transmitted on the progress in Web 2.6 or something PEG - as is the fact that the evolution of any kind which is not precise and predictable. Evolution is gradual for the most part, but "suspended", as is well-known paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould noted that occasional periods of rapid change. In this case, there was a flood of advances that have been leveled a bit 'weakening, but a key technology that enablesstill emerging Semantic Web.
What's in a name (or number)?
Of course, the Web into a new era with most of these applications, "smart" for power and will be progressed by adding more semantics to the raw data. This evolutionary progress, still in the works that qualify for the real web, in order to ratchet up to 3.0? If, indeed, which means "Web 2.0", too? Because no one called the first iteration of the information superhighway, "version 1"? The most directpossible, here is an appropriate description of what the version numbers attached to the Web is "really for:
Web 1.0: At the beginning sounds (like the beginning of another famous fairy tale), was AOL, Geocities and Hotmail. The beginning was all read-only content, static HTML pages and navigation of such a "link Listers" like Yahoo.
Web 2.0: How mature technologies - and people - user-generated content and "read-write" interactivity appeared on the scene. Were notPeople as consumers. Ordinary (non-IT), people started to contribute their energy, information and ideas on blogs and sites like Flickr, YouTube, Digg and space "social networking". The line of demarcation between consumers and content publishers continued to grow as Web 2.0 crept a way for the next revision.
) Web 3.0: If in a manner consistent with the most publicized dreams and visions ( "plans and strategies," if you prefer to make the Web 3.0Semantic Web. Clarity and usefulness would have the data for meaning, which is adapted to personalize a la iGoogle, intelligent search, as never before thought and "behavioral advertising", for individual consumers.
Same data, different goals
Certainly, the term "Web 2.0" which never has any kind of critical mass outside the tech-savvy demographic, but apparently, at least, over time a stable definition. We call it a priority to ensureThe interactivity and interoperability between two or more applications, as well as people using the Custom Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), widgets, and even some social activities such as tagging. If "Web 2.0" was the first time the "digital dictionary", many thought that it was unnecessary and, indeed, raged and railed against the use.
Today is "Web 2.0", a term the industry-standard, if not universally understood, and its history suggests that "Web 3.0" has at least a good opportunityThe adoption - as a word, though. As a technology, environment, tools or door "virtual reality", is the Web 3.0 to grow to the extent that we get smarter technology and content, individually and collectively. Adding importance to the data with the Semantic Web and microformats, and adding questions Smarts means better support for people in the way of natural language search, semantic search, the decision of the agents recommendation 'process wizards and so on.
It is a journey, not aTarget
Apart from the fact that people like to label things that probably will not bother with the version numbers for what is essentially a graphical Internet. There's always going to develop, but if we call it at least something "Web 3.0" is easier (and intimidating) as a "Semantic Web" for most people. As you will always be people who know very well how it works and where it is directed, and others, knows that a little 'tooI know nothing. 'S is always the case, as they say.
Web 2.0 (2.6) and the first step towards the Semantic Web to check the World Wide Web in a collaborative exchange of knowledge, is the recent case of Gouldian "punctuated equilibrium", the new web of social measures. Social networking has had a vast social implications far beyond the screens, keyboards and browsers. The Semantic Web, Web to stay closer to their final destination of the machine-man "understanding"and better interaction. Web development continues without a central authority to organize, plan, or time limit, which is a good thing. Wherever we stand and say: "Now we are at 3.0, is still only a milestone on the road, as web-development interrupted or not, will always be a journey, not a destination.